// the evidence
Claims, and where each one stands.
Every claim on this page carries its evidence tier. Nothing is smoothed over, and nothing a project told me is presented as something I checked.
The homepage title is Trade anything on Canton. Copy says Tradecraft is Canton's exchange: trade any token, provide liquidity, earn fees, and that it is the exchange layer for Canton.
tradecraft.fi homepageThe same homepage presents security lines: transparent reward model, no artificial emissions, predictable distribution, and built with security-first architecture, plus closing copy on transparent fees.
tradecraft.fi homepageThe Why Tradecraft page has a Built on Canton section that says Canton is private by design, built to scale and ready for real financial systems.
tradecraft.fi/why-tradecraftTradecraft's docs home centers on pooling and trading on Canton, with cards for using the exchange and providing liquidity from a Canton wallet.
docs.tradecraft.fi/readme.mdSecurity docs dated 14 January 2026 for AMM Exchange state Tradecraft and Halborn have completed an audit.
docs.tradecraft.fi/securityTerms of Service are a legally binding agreement between the user and Obsidian Software LLC, a Puerto Rico limited liability company.
docs.tradecraft.fi termsDocs home HTML points readers to the documentation index and to Markdown mirrors of docs pages.
docs.tradecraft.fiNo Tradecraft token statement was located on the homepage, Why Tradecraft, docs home, security, or terms pages. Homepage and Why pages frame rewards as trading fees and reject artificial emissions language.
tradecraft.fi own pages// what would move the score
Catalysts.
Each one names what I am watching and what would prove me wrong.
tradecraft.fi still describes itself as Canton's exchange layer.
Falsified if: the homepage drops that Canton exchange framing, or 404s.
Security docs still state a Halborn audit dated 14 January 2026 for the AMM Exchange.
Falsified if: that page withdraws the Halborn line without a dated replacement.
// what I could not verify
Gaps.
These are findings, not omissions. I looked and state what I found.
Leadership names. No named founders or executives were located on the homepage, Why Tradecraft, docs home, security, or terms pages. Terms name Obsidian Software LLC as operator.
Institutional counterparty. None found on the own-surface pages and none claimed here.
Named backers. No backers named by Tradecraft with third-party verification on the pages.
Halborn report host. The Halborn audit URL linked from Tradecraft security docs returned HTTP 429. Auditor-published findings tables, commit hashes, and per-finding fix dates were not readable on that pass.
Listed asset pairs. Homepage and docs pages did not name USDCx, cBTC, HANDL, or similar listed pair symbols. Earlier coverage that named those pairs is not repeated here.
// open to the project
Sections Tradecraft can fill.
These stay empty until the project supplies them. Anything supplied is labeled as supplied, dated, and never rendered as something I verified. Declining changes nothing else on this page.
Architecture
How the product is built, in the team's own words.
Audit
Any audit, review or internal security practice not published today.
Roadmap
What ships next and when, so the catalysts above can carry real dates.
Usage figures
Published usage with a methodology, so a count can move off announced tier.
// conflicts
Position.
Position disclosure. I hold $CC and $CNTN. This page covers a Canton-native product, which triggers disclosure under my map. Tradecraft itself is not a holding of mine. The full conflicts register is on the disclosure page. Tradecraft has no commercial relationship with Canton Catalyst, and nothing here was requested, reviewed or paid for.
// corrections
Correction log.
No corrections recorded. First published 16 September 2026.